Digitally Tailored

The Power and (sometimes bad) Potential of Professional Products

In the world of software development, a common dilemma developers often face is whether to invest in professional products or opt for free and open-source software (FOSS). The recent controversy surrounding Unity, a popular game engine, has brought this issue to the forefront. Unity has recently implemented a new policy that imposes additional fees on developers for various actions, including end-user installations of a Unity game. This move has sparked outrage in the development community, pushing many developers to explore alternatives like Godot, a FOSS game engine.

The Unity controversy serves as a stark reminder of the risks associated with long-term dependencies on professional products. When a company like Unity, which has a history of making similar moves since becoming an IPO, suddenly changes its terms, it can have a significant impact on developers who rely on their products. This raises an important question: Why pay for professional products when there are free alternatives available?

One of the key benefits of investing in professional products is the quality and reliability they offer. These products often come with a dedicated support team, regular updates, and a robust ecosystem of plugins and extensions. However, these benefits come with a cost. Not only do you pay a monetary price, but you also risk being at the mercy of the company’s decisions, as seen with Unity.

On the other hand, using FOSS can be intimidating, especially for enterprise applications. The fear of lack of support, potential security issues, and the need for technical expertise to manage and customize the software can deter many from using FOSS. However, FOSS offers a level of freedom and flexibility that is hard to match. The open-source nature of these tools means that you can customize and adapt them to your specific needs. Plus, you’re not tied to the whims of a single company.

Moreover, the FOSS community is a treasure trove of innovation and collaboration. With developers from around the globe contributing to these projects, FOSS often leads the way in terms of innovation. The recent surge in Godot’s user base and funding is a testament to this.

Table of Contents